A Few Final Thoughts on the Ordination
(For anyone that did not read my original post, please take a peak one below first!)
For me, the most immediate effect of Thursday’s historic ordination of Abraham Geiger Kolleg graduates is that I no longer have to explain myself or put parenthesis around my statements when people ask me which
Rabbi Daniel Alter, the only native German born of the three newly ordained has been called to serve at the synagogue in
The more alike two things are, the more we notice the differences. Having now been immersed in more than one major religious tradition in my life, I can say with a great deal of confidence that the desire to dispute the details almost always overrides any attempt to agree on the major issues. Even within my own congregation, some of the most emotional issues that we have dealt with in recent years have revolved around specific issues of food. I am not saying that the discussions in and of themselves are bad. As the chairman of the Religious Practices committee at my Shul (and a loved and respected friend of mine) said during one of these emotional debates, working through these issues is a sacred obligation—a mitzvah. In the Jewish tradition, one only needs the most surface reading of the Talmud to see that the discussion itself carries every bit the wisdom and value as the decisions that come from the discussions. Even in Torah—are we not the Children of Israel because Israel/Jacob wrestled with G-d? Yet let me submit that there is a huge difference between the process of working out differences and the refusal to even come to the table to begin the conversation. I know that in the States the various traditions of Orthodox thru to Reform meet for social action goals, but attempts to cohesively and comprehensively come to the table as partners in the same faith tradition have failed. Why? Mitzvot and women on the Bimah and Kashrut and conversion and Torah and Talmud and tradition and choice and homosexuality and prayer and and and blah! Yes—these are all important! The essence of so much of that which makes this faith tradition special to specific followers of this faith tradition is wrapped up into the perspective one takes on the list above. And don’t think any other faith tradition is exempt. In mere moments I could easily create an analogous list for my Christian and Muslin and Hindu and Humanist and Non-Believing and any-other-tradition-or-non-tradition- you-can-imagine-friends as to why and upon what we choose to argue that keeps us from focusing on the business of healing this world. Again, I am not saying that for any tradition these things are unimportant. I am merely asking if any of these items are worth, in my tradition for example, folks not coming together to address the items that are universal to all? The duties whose worth cannot be measured? The honoring father and mother and the acts of loving kindness and the visiting the sick and the praying with sincerity and the making peace where there is strife and the celebrating with bride and groom and the consoling the bereaved and, yes the study of Torah which leads to them all. That we may disagree on the specifics of these—does that mean we cannot support each other in the very real struggle to approach each of these duties? If I don’t believe that G-d dictated Torah by rote to Moses, does that mean my study of Torah, my teachings, the inspiration and the bond in these words that take me back thousands of years and change my life have any less relevance or significance? Jews have always struggled with the items in these lists of details, as have sincere followers of other faiths and no faiths. The struggle is not the dangerous part—it is the not meeting at the table in the first place that will tear us apart.
So here we have
Paul
Comments